Reconciling Air Quality, Climate, and Economic Goals

liu zhenya headshot

中国国家电网公司前董事长刘振亚就全球能源互联网在哈佛大学发表公开演讲

April 17, 2018

2018年4月17日,中国国家电网公司(SGCC)前董事长、现全球能源互联网发展合作组织(GEIDCO)主席刘振亚先生在哈佛大学法学院发表题为“能源创新之道:从特高压电网到全球能源互联网”的公开演讲。演讲探讨了建立全球智能电网的需求与潜力,通过全球能源互联网,用可再生资源生产的能源能够以更低的成本进入千家万户。本次活动由哈佛大学中国能源、经济与环境项目,哈佛法学院东亚法律研究项目,哈佛John A. Paulson工程与应用科学学院,以及哈佛环球学院联合举办。点击此处阅读有关报道。

...
Read more about 中国国家电网公司前董事长刘振亚就全球能源互联网在哈佛大学发表公开演讲
MEP meeting

同解振华特别代表和李干杰部长进行高层次会晤

August 30, 2017

2017年8月4日,中国气候变化事务特别代表解振华主任在其北京的办公室举行了研究和政策咨询会,会晤哈佛大学中国项目的Mike McElroy和Steve Wofsy教授、项目执行总监Chris Nielsen、前哈佛大学中国项目学者张红军博士(霍兰德奈特律师事务所),以及鲁玺教授(清华大学)。议题包括:中美处理气候问题的现状以及地区政府在气候问题治理中日益重要的作用;中国不同地区碳排放控制能力的差异;碳市场与碳税收政策各自的优势和混合碳定价政策的前景;以及尝试用地球工程来解决气候问题所带来的高风险。... Read more about 同解振华特别代表和李干杰部长进行高层次会晤

beijing air pollution

《财富》杂志刊登何博士和Nielsen总监有关中国空气污染困境的专栏文章

January 10, 2017

哈佛大学中国项目执行总监Chris Nielsen先生与项目经济学家何文胜博士在《财富》杂志(包括《财富》杂志中文版)发表专栏文章,阐述了中国处于红色警报级别的空气污染情况之所以如此难以遏制,其背后被低估了的原因是什么。这些因素各种各样,与大气化学、气象、经济、政治等方面都有关。... Read more about 《财富》杂志刊登何博士和Nielsen总监有关中国空气污染困境的专栏文章

screen_shot_2017-03-30_at_5.01.18_am.png

《华尔街日报》、《哈佛志》、《气候发展》和《南华早报》报道哈佛大学中国项目关于空气污染和碳税的研究

December 17, 2013

《华尔街日报》《气候发展》《哈佛志》《南华早报》援引了Chris Nielsen总监、何文胜博士和曹静教授关于碳税的看法,三人也指出了中国在能源与环境方面的优势与不足,相关观点引述自哈佛大学中国项目的新书《中国更晴朗的天空》(Clearer Skies Over China)。
... Read more about 《华尔街日报》、《哈佛志》、《气候发展》和《南华早报》报道哈佛大学中国项目关于空气污染和碳税的研究

Nielsen总监在《环境与健康展望》期刊表示中国细颗粒物(PM2.5)变化趋势令人鼓舞

Nielsen总监在《环境与健康展望》期刊表示中国细颗粒物(PM2.5)变化趋势令人鼓舞

February 29, 2016

《环境与健康展望》期刊 (Environmental Health Perspectives)援引哈佛大学中国项目执行总监Chris Nielsen先生的观点:与大众普遍的认知相反,根据卫星观测,自2007年开始,中国大部分地区细颗粒物(PM2.5)浓度的年平均值已经下降。... Read more about Nielsen总监在《环境与健康展望》期刊表示中国细颗粒物(PM2.5)变化趋势令人鼓舞

screen_shot_2017-03-30_at_4.48.05_am.png

《经济学人》、《中国日报》报道哈佛大学中国项目的研究;《纽约时报》就同一主题刊登专栏文章

March 14, 2014

《中国日报》对哈佛大学中国项目的碳定价和空气污染研究进行报道;《经济学人》杂志引述我们项目专著《中国更晴朗的天空》(Clearer Skies Over China) 中关于中国二氧化硫排放控制的有效性的研究结论,同时项目研究人员Chris Nielsen先生与何文胜博士也在《纽约时报》就同一主题撰写专栏文章。
... Read more about 《经济学人》、《中国日报》报道哈佛大学中国项目的研究;《纽约时报》就同一主题刊登专栏文章

Xiaoqi Guo and James K Hammitt. 2009. “Compensating wage differentials with unemployment: Evidence from China.” Environmental and Resource Economics, 42, 2, Pp. 187-209. Publisher's VersionAbstract
We estimate the economic value of mortality risk in China using the compensating-wage-differential method. We find a positive and statistically significant correlation between wages and occupational fatality risk. The estimated effect is largest for unskilled workers. Unemployment reduces compensation for risk, which suggests that some of the assumptions under which compensating wage differentials can be interpreted as measures of workers’ preferences for risk and income are invalid when unemployment is high. Workers may be unwilling to quit high-risk jobs when alternative employment is difficult to obtain, violating the assumption of perfect mobility, or some workers (e.g., new migrants) may be poorly informed about between-job differences in risk, violating the assumption of perfect information. These factors suggest our estimates of the value per statistical life (VSL) in China, which range from approximately US$30,000 to US$100,000, may be biased downward. Alternative estimates adjust for heterogeneity of risk within industry by assuming that risk is concentrated among low-skill workers. These estimates, which are likely to be biased downward, range from US$7,000 to US$20,000.

This study developed a new approach to the valuation of health risk in China, for monetizing health damages of environmental degradation.

Jing Cao, Mun S Ho, and Dale W Jorgenson. 2009. “The local and global benefits of green tax policies in China.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3, 2, Pp. 231-250. Publisher's VersionAbstract
This article describes a multidisciplinary study of market-based policies for controlling air pollution in China. While previous studies have examined the costs and benefits of pollution control separately, this approach determines them together using an economy–environment model for China. We employ air dispersion simulations and population maps to calculate health damages due to air pollution. This provides estimates of incremental damages for industry output and fuel use. Based on these marginal damages, we simulate the effect of “green taxes” on the economy and show that the environmental benefits exceed the aggregate costs, ignoring adjustment costs for individual sectors.

Pages